The law does not require that possession shall be evidenced by a complete enclosure, nor by persons remaining continuously upon the land and constantly from day to day performing acts of ownership thereon. It is sufficient if the land is used continuously for the purposes to which it may be in its nature adapted. Nennemann v. Rebuck, 242 Neb. 604, 496 N.W.2d 467 (1993); Weiss v. Meyer, 208 Neb. 429, 303 N.W.2d 765 (1981).